Other structures coverage is designed to protect detached buildings on a property, but it does not guarantee full financial protection in every situation. Many homeowners assume that because they have Coverage B on their policy, all detached structures are adequately insured. In reality, there are several common scenarios where other structures coverage falls short, leaving homeowners responsible for significant out-of-pocket costs after a loss.
One of the most frequent reasons other structures coverage is not enough is insufficient coverage limits. Most policies calculate Coverage B as a percentage of the dwelling coverage limit, often around 10%. While this may be adequate for properties with a small shed or a basic fence, it often fails to reflect the true value of larger or multiple detached structures. Detached garages, workshops, barns, and extensive fencing can collectively cost far more to rebuild than the default limit allows.
Underinsurance becomes especially problematic after catastrophic losses. A severe fire or storm can damage or destroy multiple detached structures at once. Even though the damage results from a single covered event, the combined rebuilding costs may exceed the coverage limit, leaving the homeowner responsible for the remaining expenses. This situation often surprises homeowners who assumed the percentage-based limit would be sufficient.
Another major limitation arises from excluded perils. Standard other structures coverage does not protect against floods, earthquakes, or earth movement. Homeowners in areas prone to these risks may face total losses to detached structures without any insurance assistance unless separate policies are in place. This gap is particularly concerning for structures located farther from the main home, where flood exposure may be greater.
High deductibles can also make other structures coverage feel inadequate. Percentage-based wind or hurricane deductibles are calculated using the dwelling coverage limit, not the other structures limit. As a result, damage to a relatively small structure may not exceed the deductible, leaving the homeowner to cover most or all of the repair costs.
Valuation method plays another critical role. Policies that settle other structures claims on an actual cash value basis subtract depreciation from claim payments. Older sheds, fences, or garages may receive minimal payouts even when damage is covered. Replacement cost coverage provides better protection, but only if coverage limits are high enough to cover rebuilding expenses.
Building code upgrades can create additional gaps. If rebuilding a detached structure requires compliance with updated codes, standard other structures coverage may not pay for these additional costs. Ordinance or law coverage may be required to cover mandated upgrades, even when the original structure was compliant at the time it was built.
Use of the structure can also limit coverage. Detached structures used for business activities may have restricted or excluded coverage under a standard homeowners policy. Without additional business insurance, homeowners may discover too late that coverage is insufficient.
Rising construction costs further complicate coverage adequacy. Inflation, material shortages, and labor constraints can drive rebuilding costs beyond what coverage limits were designed to handle. Limits that were adequate years ago may no longer reflect current rebuilding expenses.
Finally, policy assumptions can contribute to inadequate coverage. Insurers often assume detached structures are simple and low-cost, which may not be true for properties with custom-built or specialized outbuildings. If these assumptions are not corrected, coverage may fall short after a loss.
Recognizing when other structures coverage is not enough allows homeowners to take proactive steps to strengthen their insurance protection. Reviewing limits, adding endorsements, and addressing excluded risks helps ensure detached structures are adequately protected before damage occurs.
Related Guides